Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Latest
    • A new malpractice being observed: Reviewers asking their own papers to cite
    • 100% APC Waiver for Authors from “Group A” Category Countries Indicated by Research4Life
    • Retraction Notice: Pharmacological Actions of Impatiens
    • DOI Allocated and Activated for 281 Articles and Abstracts Published in the period of 2014-2017
    • IGJPS, 2021, Vol 11, Issue 3
    • IGJPS, 2021, Vol 11, Issue 2
    • IGJPS, 2021, Vol 11, Issue 1
    • Table of Contents, Vol 10, Issue 4
    INDO GLOBAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCESINDO GLOBAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Issues
      • IGJPS 2022 and Onwards
      • IGJPS, 2021, Vol 11, Issue 3
      • IGJPS, 2021, Vol 11, Issue 2
      • IGJPS, 2021, Vol 11, Issue 1
      • IGJPS, 2020, Vol 10, Issue 4
      • IGJPS, 2020, Vol 10, Issue 3
      • IGJPS, 2020, Vol 10, Issue 2
      • IGJPS, 2020, Vol 10, Issue 1
      • IGJPS, 2019, Vol 9, Issue 2 (Suppl.)
      • IGJPS, 2019, Vol 9, Issue 2
      • IGJPS, 2019, Vol 9, Issue 1
      • IGJPS, 2018, Vol 8, Issue 3
      • IGJPS, 2018, Vol 8, Issue 2
      • IGJPS, 2018, Vol 8, Issue 1
      • IGJPS, 2017, Vol 7, Issue 2
      • IGJPS, 2017, Vol 7, Issue 1
      • IGJPS, 2016, Vol 6, Issue 2
      • IGJPS, 2016, Vol 6, Issue 1
      • IGJPS, 2015, Vol 5, Issue 3
      • IGJPS, 2015, Vol 5, Issue 2
      • IGJPS, 2015, Vol 5, Issue 1
      • IGJPS, 2014, Vol 4, Issue 3
      • IGJPS, 2014, Vol 4, Issue 2
      • IGJPS, 2014, Vol4, Issue 1
      • IGJPS, 2013, Vol 3, Issue 3
      • IGJPS,2013, Vol 3, Issue 2
      • IGJPS, 2013, Vol 3, Issue 1
      • IGJPS, 2012, Vol 2, Issue 4
      • IGJPS, 2012, Vol 2, Issue 3
      • IGJPS, 2012, Vol 2, Issue 2
      • IGJPS, 2012, Vol 2, Issue 1
      • IGJPS, 2011, Vol 1, Issue 4
      • IGJPS, 2011, Vol 1, Issue 3
      • IGJPS, 2011, Vol 1, Issue 2
      • IGJPS, 2011, Vol 1, Issue 1
    • Editorial Board
    • Guidelines For Authors
    • Indexed
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Contact Us
    INDO GLOBAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCESINDO GLOBAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
    You are at:Home»News»FDA completes work on three drug user fee programs

    FDA completes work on three drug user fee programs

    0
    By Rajeev Singla on January 23, 2012 News
    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has completed its recommendations for three user fee programs that will help speed safe and effective drugs and lower-cost generic drug and biosimilar biological products to patients, FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D. said today. The recommendations were transmitted to Congress today by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
    The programs include the fifth authorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), and new user fee programs for human generic drugs and biosimilar biological products. Work on the proposals was concluded before the agency’s mid-January deadline.
    Under a user fee program, industry agrees to pay fees to help fund a portion of the FDA’s drug review activities while the FDA agrees to overall performance goals such as reviewing a certain percentage of applications within a particular time frame.
    “These final recommendations offer a great example of what can be achieved when the FDA, industry and other stakeholders work together on the same goal,” Hamburg said. “At a time of greater budgetary constraint, user fees provide a critical way for leveraging appropriated dollars, ensuring that FDA has the resources needed to conduct reviews in a timely fashion.”
    Said Hamburg: “Human drug user fees have revolutionized the drug review process in the United States since they were adopted 20 years ago, allowing the FDA to speed the application review process without compromising the agency’s high standards.”
    The proposed user fee programs for generic drugs and biosimilars are modeled on the successful PDUFA program “which has ensured a predictable, consistent, and streamlined premarket program for prescription drugs,” Hamburg said. As a result of the continued investment of PDUFA resources, the United States now leads the world in first introduction of novel drugs.
    PDUFA was created by Congress in 1992 and must be reauthorized every five years. The current program, known as PDUFA IV, will expire on Sept. 30, 2012, unless reauthorized by Congress. FDA’s recommendations for PDUFA V were developed in consultation both with drug industry representatives and with patient and consumer advocates.
    Under the recommendations, fees paid by industry would support continued timely review of critical prescription drugs, as well as advance the development of drugs for rare diseases, provide for enhanced communication with small or emerging companies, increase the use of standardized electronic data to improve quality and efficiency, and foster the use of new clinical endpoints that improve drug development times and help address unmet medical needs.
    The proposed new Generic Drug User Fee program would provide the FDA with needed funding at a time when generic drug applications are on the rise. Generic drug user fees would help ensure consumers timely access to safe, high-quality and effective generic drugs, which account for two-thirds of all prescriptions dispensed in the U.S.
    My skin is very oily and pimples appeared regularly destroying my mood. Every pimple left a spot and my face was like a map of spots – an awful scene. Every morning I woke up in a nervous panic what else may have been appeared on my face. I do remember those days with panic. For a long time I thought the pumps would disappear themselves, but day by day the situation deepened and I referred to a local doctor who prescribed me Accutane. I`m so grateful to him . It took me a month to stabilize the skin condition. I highly recommend this medicine from http://www.papsociety.org/accutane-isotretinoin/ to people with Acne.
    The FDA receives 800 to 900 new generic-drug-related applications annually. These applications are increasingly complex and frequently involve products manufactured outside of the U.S. In exchange for fees on facilities and product applications, the proposal includes performance metrics such as review timeframes and a commitment to achieve parity between surveillance inspections of foreign and domestic establishments by the 2017 fiscal year. As a result, FDA expects that the proposal would effectively eliminate the review backlog and significantly reduce review times.
    A biosimilar is a biological product that is highly similar to a U.S.-licensed reference biological product notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components, and for which there are no clinically meaningful differences between the biological product and the reference product in terms of the safety, purity, and potency of the product. The proposed Biosimilar and Interchangeable Products User Fee program is intended for products approved under a new abbreviated approval pathway for biological products shown to be biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed biological product. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 contains a subtitle called the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCI) of 2009, which established this pathway.
    Prior to it becoming law, competition in the biologic drug market was stifled. Enactment of BPCI will spark the development of a new segment of the industry, where companies will be able to develop alternative products. This will help spur innovation, improve consumer choice and drive down costs.
    The recommended user fee program for biosimilars includes fees for products in development to generate revenue in the near-term and to provide FDA with the resources needed to support development-phase meetings with sponsors of biosimilar biological product candidates.
    Source Code: US FDA
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    A new malpractice being observed: Reviewers asking their own papers to cite

    100% APC Waiver for Authors from “Group A” Category Countries Indicated by Research4Life

    Retraction Notice: Pharmacological Actions of Impatiens

    Comments are closed.

    Latest News
    A new malpractice being observed: Reviewers asking their own papers to cite
    ...
    100% APC Waiver for Authors from “Group A” Category Countries Indicated by Research4Life
    ...
    Retraction Notice: Pharmacological Actions of Impatiens
    ...
    DOI Allocated and Activated for 281 Articles and Abstracts Published in the period of 2014-2017
    ...
    Top Peer Reviewer as New Associate Editor: Dr. Ghulam Md. Ashraf, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
    ...
    Highly Cited Articles

    Microencapsulation–A Novel Approach in Drug Delivery: A Review

    Review on the pharmacognostical & pharmacological characterization of Apium graveolens Linn


    Medicinal Plants of Rural India: A Review of Use by Indian Folks


    Self Emulsifying Drug Delivery System: A Tool in Solubility Enhancement of Poorly Soluble Drugs


    Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Cocos nucifera Linn.(Arecaceae) endocarp extracts

    Impotant Links
    • About Us
    • Call For Papers
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • Guidelines For Authors
    • Home Page
    • Indexed
    • Issues
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Checkout
    • Transaction Results
    • Your Account
    Sponsored
    Copyright © 2011 iGlobal Research & Publishing Foundation
    Powered By :- Ganga Graphix.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.